Best FiveM Interaction Script in 2026

Two products wearing one name

Search for an interaction script and you get two categories that do not compete with each other. The first is infrastructure: a targeting framework that other resources call into, so that your inventory, your job scripts and the shop you bought last week can all put an option on the same fridge without knowing about each other. ox_target and qb-target are this. Nobody buys them for the experience, they are the socket everything else plugs into.

The second is authored interaction: a floating icon over a ped, a hold to confirm bar on a safe, a conversation with branching answers and a camera that frames the face. These are not plumbing, they are content, and they are the reason a server feels handmade rather than assembled. Confusing the two is the single most common mistake in this category. Replacing your targeting framework because you liked a dialogue demo means rewiring every resource on the server for a feature that could have been added alongside it.

Third eye, proximity prompt, dialogue tree

The third eye model has been the default since bt-target in 2021. The player holds a key, a reticle appears, a ray is cast from the camera, and whatever it hits offers a list of options. It is precise, it costs nothing when the key is not held, and it scales to a ridiculous number of registered points because none of them are being polled. It is also invisible. A new player who has never been told the key exists will walk past every interaction on your map, which is why servers with a third eye run tutorial popups.

The proximity model inverts that. The resource keeps a list of points, checks squared distance on a loop, and draws something in the world when the player is close: an icon, a bar, a key hint. Nothing is hidden, so discoverability is free, and the prompt can carry authored styling per point. The cost is that it polls, so a badly built one with a thread per registration will show up in resmon, and that pointing at a specific bone on a moving vehicle is awkward in a way a raycast never is.

Dialogue trees are a third thing entirely and are usually bolted onto a proximity system. The player approaches a ped, a panel opens with two or three replies, each reply leads to another node or fires an event, and a focus camera and a hidden HUD keep the player inside the scene. It is the closest FiveM gets to a quest system, and no targeting framework in this comparison ships one.

What actually happens when a player presses the key

Every option in this guide runs the same four stages, and knowing them tells you which of a vendor list of features is real. The stage that separates a safe script from a liability is the last one. A prompt that appears only for police is a convenience, not a lock, and if the server handler does not re-check the job, the item and the distance before opening the armoury, the check may as well not exist. The same applies to a hold duration: holding for three seconds is a client side animation, and the server sees one event either way.

Performance sits in stage one and is the reason to read the config rather than the store page. A raycast that only runs while a key is held is close to free. A distance loop is not, so what you want to see in a proximity resource is one shared scanner thread with a configurable interval that all registrations feed into, rather than a new thread per point. If you are auditing a stack for frame time in general, the wider version of that exercise is in the server optimization guide.

The free field, and it is most of the field

This is an unusual category in FiveM: the best product in it is free, and so are most of its competitors. ox_target is MIT, it takes zones, models, entities and bones through one options table, it supports group and item checks, it requires ox_lib and it defaults to the left ALT key. It was last pushed in June 2026. There is no serious argument for paying money to replace it as the framework layer.

Behind it, the history is worth knowing because outdated tutorials are still sending people to dead resources. bt-target came first and was archived in September 2021. qtarget followed, and its repository description is now a single sentence: Use ox_target instead. qb-target descends from qtarget, needs PolyZone, and takes its box zone parameters positionally rather than as a table, which is exactly the awkwardness ox_target was written to remove. It is not abandoned, it was still receiving commits in August 2026, so a working QBCore server has no emergency on its hands. It is simply not where a new build should start.

The free alternatives worth naming are the ones that changed the model rather than the API. sleepless_interact is GPL-3.0 and draws its indicators in the world as 3D DUI rather than under a reticle, and its version 2 reuses ox_target code to keep feature parity and ships an ox_target bridge that, once enabled, handles the ox_target exports itself, which makes it the only option here you can adopt without rewriting the resources you already run. envi-interact is a press to interact library with multi choice menus, speech bubbles, sliders and NPC creation, though the repository carries no licence file, which is a legal question rather than a technical one. Avenida Interact is a free download covering ESX, QBCore, Qbox, ox, vRP and standalone with 24 hint icons, branching NPC dialogue, 19 exports, 15 locales and, since version 1.1.0, no dependencies at all. And if all you actually needed was a line of text near a door, cd_drawtextui from Codesign is free and is two events, show and hide.

The FiveM interaction market in September 2026

Every price below was read from the vendor page or the repository in September 2026. Read the model column before the price column, because a text prompt resource, a targeting framework and a dialogue engine are not substitutes for each other at any price. Note also that a large part of this market sells through Tebex storefronts that a plain fetch cannot read, so any product whose price could not be confirmed was left out of this table rather than estimated.

Two things fall out of that table. The first is that paid money here does not buy interaction, it buys either source access or a layer above interaction: Lation sells a UI library where the text prompt is one system among many, and the Advanced Interaction Script sells AI driven NPC conversation rather than a targeting framework. The second is that the escrow question is unusually cheap to answer in this category, because three of the maintained free options hand you a readable codebase already: ox_target under MIT, qb-target and sleepless_interact under GPL-3.0. That argument is worth understanding properly before you pay for source anywhere on your server, and it is unpacked in the escrow versus open source guide.

What switching actually costs

Between target systems, the mechanical work is small and the inventory work is not. Moving from qb-target to ox_target means swapping the export name and rewriting the option fields, since one takes positional box zone arguments and the other takes a single table. That is an afternoon for code you own. The bill arrives from code you do not own: every escrowed resource on the server that hardcodes a qb-target export has to be updated by its vendor or wrapped in a shim that forwards the call. Count those resources first. A server with fifteen paid scripts registering their own options is a different project from a server with three.

Moving from a target system to a proximity system is a different order of work, and this is the honest warning in this guide. Nothing that registers ox_target options will appear in a proximity resource by itself, because there is no shared registry, so every prompt on your map has to be authored again by hand. The exception is sleepless_interact, which ships an ox_target bridge you switch on so that it handles the ox_target exports itself and existing resources keep working while the visual model changes underneath them. If you want the world anchored look with none of the rewiring, that is the option to look at first, and I would rather say that than sell you something else.

The realistic plan for most servers is not a migration at all. Keep ox_target as the socket, add a proximity or dialogue layer for the handful of moments that deserve authored treatment, and write down which system owns which entity so the same prop never carries two prompts. If you are wiring keybinds by hand while you do it, the control IDs are in the FiveM controls list.

Where Var-Interact fits, honestly

Var-Interact is in the second category described at the top of this page. It is a standalone 3D world space interaction system with no framework dependency: distance based hint icons that arm a hold to confirm panel when the player gets close, multi choice menus, and NPC dialogue trees exposed through exports. The hold duration, the key bind and a per point canInteract gate are configurable per registration. Peds carry branching dialogue with a focus camera, player hiding and random voice lines, and stream in and out by distance on their own. Interactions attach to a static world coordinate, to an existing entity by handle, or to every prop of a model hash through a shared scanner thread, and points can be created and removed at runtime with interactCreate and interactRemove.

The parts I would actually point at are the ones that save authoring time. The shipped example maps prompts onto more than 80 vanilla props, ATMs, vending machines, safes, computers, gas pumps and arcades among them, so a large part of the map has usable interactions before you have written anything. There are 23 hint icons and a named colour palette with English and French aliases, the UI styling and the strings are configurable without touching the bundle, there are hooks to hide and restore the compass, minimap or inventory during a dialogue, and peds, points and blips clean themselves up when the resource or a consumer stops.

Now the part that matters more than the feature list. Var-Interact is not a drop-in replacement for ox_target, and installing it does not make your existing scripts show prompts. It has no compatibility layer for ox_target or qb-target options, so every interaction you want from it is one you register yourself. It does not do bone level targeting on vehicles, it is not the right tool for a hundred generated points across a map, and if your server is built on paid resources that assume a target export, it belongs alongside that system rather than instead of it. Var scripts are built on exactly that assumption: Var-Chess ships three interaction backends, a dependency free drawtext prompt, Var-Interact hints or ox_target zones, and works with whichever you have installed.

Two competitors beat it on its own ground and it is worth saying which. If what you want is the world anchored look without rewiring anything, sleepless_interact documents an ox_target bridge that handles the ox_target exports once you enable it, so the resources you already run keep working unchanged, and Var-Interact has no equivalent. If what you want is the authored proximity layer for nothing, Avenida Interact is a free download with 24 hint icons against 23, branching NPC dialogue, 19 exports, 15 locale files, ESX, QBCore, Qbox, ox, vRP and standalone auto-detected, and its config left outside escrow so you can edit it in production. Install that one first and see whether it already does what you need.

Pricing is straightforward and, read in September 2026, the escrow build was listed at 0.00 EUR, the Partially Open build at 17.99 EUR and the Open Source build at 35.99 EUR. Which means the honest recommendation is to take the free build, register three prompts and one dialogue, and decide from that whether the authored layer earns a place next to your target system. If it does not, you have lost nothing, and ox_target is still free.

Related: FiveM controls list · FiveM server optimization